Quote: “…students
were encouraged to view comprehension as an ongoing process in which they made
decision about which texts to juxtapose and how to juxtapose them; to make
meaning from multiple texts as if any text was a ‘portal’ through which to view
other texts waiting to be apprehended.” (2)
Response: This
is exactly what I see reading as. It’s like entering a world followed by all
the other worlds you’ve read about. This even works with non-fiction books
where research and data, or information, can help you comprehend the text you
are currently reading. This works best when learning. For example, sometimes
what I learn in one class is mentioned in another class, or provides a
foundation for it. Knowledge builds on itself and by comparing more than one
reading or source of knowledge; it can help you come to a realization that you
didn’t think was possible. Aside from that, it encourages further learning when
something you learned in the past pops up again; it shows how meaningful and eternal
knowledge really is. Another point Bloome makes is that we do all this without
realizing it. And it’s true. We do this in essays all the time! Or when we are
having an argument or debate about any subject, from politics to what’s the
best ice cream flavor. We gather data that is useful to us, and this article
encourages that that thinking and gathering of information to be able to
manipulate it and use it when we need to.

Comments
Post a Comment